PSS Sustainability Assessment and Monitoring Framework (PSS-SAM) – Case Study of a Multi-module PSS Solution

Author: Michael Abramovici, Youssef Aidi, Quezada Akamitl, Thomas Schindler

Keywords: #Product_Lifecycle_Management, #Product_Service_Systems, #Case_Study, #Sustainability_Assessment 

Abstract

Business-to-business Product Service System (PSS) solutions are characterized by intensive interaction among PSS providers, suppliers, and customers, as well as an integration of physical and immaterial solution modules. These factors increase the complexity and interdisciplinary of such offerings. Furthermore, the characteristics complicate sustainability assessment and monitoring of PSS, as environmental, social, and economic concerns have to be integrated into a PSS by minimizing negative impacts of the PSS on these three axes throughout the PSS lifecycle. The indicator-based framework “PSS Sustainability Assessment and Monitoring (PSS-SAM)” has been specifically developed to support managers and decision makers in dealing with the complex situation described above. This framework considers the most important sustainability aspects throughout the entire PSS lifecycle and adheres to European standard requirements. The results of a previous work have already confirmed the usability of the framework to assess the sustainability of one PSS module (availability of spindle) within a single PSS lifecycle phase (operating phase). The aim of this paper is to present the improvements of the PSS-SAM framework that facilitate sustainability assessment of PSS solutions with multiple modules throughout their entire lifecycle. The improved framework has been validated by a case study of an industrial micro-production PSS solution including multiple modules (spindle, maintenance, training, etc.). The long-term goal is to develop IT solutions that support the sustainability assessment of PSS.

About this publication

Cite this publication

Abramovici, M.; Aidi, Y.; Quezada, A.; Schindler, T.; In: Proceedings of the 6th CIRP Conference on Industrial Product-Service Systems, IPS² 2014, Windsor, Canada, Mai 1-2, 2014, pp. 140-145

References

  1. Abramovici M, Dang B, Quezada A, Schindler T. A Sustainability Assessment and Monitoring Framework for Product-Service Systems. In: Ćosić P, editors. Proceedings of the 5th MOTSP. Zagreb: Croatian Association for PLM; 2013.
  2. Abramovici M, Quezada A, Schindler T. MEDA: Manufacturing Energy Demand Assessment method for future production planning and product development. In: Seliger G, editors. Proceedings of the11th GCSM. Berlin:;1; Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin; 2013. p. 697-702.
  3. Warhurst A. Sustainability Indicators and Sustainability Performance Management. MMSD; 2002. ed. 43.
  4. Epstein MJ, Roy MJ. Sustainability in Action: Identifying and Measuring the key performance drivers. Long Range Planning Journal 34; 2001. p. 585-604.
  5. Hubbard G. Sustainable organization performance: Towards a practical measurement system. Monash Business Review 2(3); 2006.
  6. EU. COM 397 Communication from the commission on the Sustainable Consumption and Production and Sustainable Industrial Policy Action Plan, Brussels: European Commission; 2008.
  7. OECD. Sustainable Development Studies – Conducting Sustainability Assessments, Paris: OECD; 2008.
  8. VDI. VDI guideline 4070 - Sustainable management in small and medium-sized enterprises. Berlin: Beuth Verlag GmbH; 2006.
  9. Abramovici M, Quezada A, Schindler T. IT support for eco design - state of the art and research requirements. Seliger G, editor. Proceedings of the 10th GCSM Istanbul 2012. Berlin: Springer; 2012.
  10. Omann I. Product Service Systems and their Impacts on Sustainable Development. http://seri.at/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Omann_2003_productservicesystems_sustainabl e_ development.pdf. 2012-01-25.
  11. Schröter M, Gandenberger C, Biege S. Buschak D. Assessment of the sustainability effects of Product-Service Systems. Proceedings of the 2nd CIRP IPS2 Conference 2010. Linköping: Linköping University Press; 2010. p. 67-74.
  12. Pigosso DCA, Sousa SR, Fiho AG, Ometto AR, Rozenfeld H. Is the Industrial Product-Service System really sustainable?. Proceedings of the 2nd CIRP IPS2 Conference 2010. Linköping: Linköping University Press; 2010. p. 59-65.
  13. Maxwell D, Sheate W, Vorst R. Functional and systems aspects of the sustainable product and service development approach for industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14 (17). 2006. p. 1466-14789.
  14. Tukker A, Tischner U. New Business for Old Europe: Product-Service Development. Competitiveness and Sustainability. Sheffield: Greenleaf; 2006.
  15. Sundin E, Lindahl M, Larsson H. Environmental and Economic Benefits of Industrial Product/service Systems. Proceedings of the 2nd CIRP IPS2 Conference 2010. Linköping: Linköping University Press; 2010. p. 91-98.
  16. Moss M, Grunkemeyer, T. Using Resident Formulated Multi- Dimensional Indicators to Assess Urban Communities‟ Progress Toward Meeting Sustainability Goals. In: Horner M, Hardcastle C, editors International Conference on Whole Life Urban Sustainability and its Assessment. Glasgow: Glasgow Caledonian University; 2007.
  17. Shaw CF, Che BJ. An Overview of a proposed measurement infrastructure for sustainable manufacturing. In: Shunmugam MS, Babu Ramesh N, editors. Proceedings of the 7th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing. Chennai: 2009. p 355-360.